Auto-Combo: Let OmniRoute Pick the Best AI for You
TL;DR: Set your model to
autoand OmniRoute automatically picks the best AI provider for each request. No configuration needed.
What It Does
Section titled “What It Does”Instead of choosing a specific AI model (like GPT-4o or Claude), you can let OmniRoute automatically pick the best one for each request. It considers:
- Health — Is the provider working right now?
- Speed — How fast is it?
- Cost — How much does it cost?
- Quality — Is it good at this type of task?
- Capacity — Does it have quota remaining?
OmniRoute scores all your connected providers and picks the best one. If it fails, it automatically tries the next one.
Quick Start
Section titled “Quick Start”Step 1: Set your model to auto in your IDE or CLI:
model: "auto"Step 2: That’s it! OmniRoute handles the rest.
Step 3 (optional): Use a variant for specific tasks:
model: "auto/coding" # Best for codemodel: "auto/fast" # Fastest responsemodel: "auto/cheap" # Cheapest optionWhich “auto” Should I Use?
Section titled “Which “auto” Should I Use?”| If you want… | Use this | Best for | How it works |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best overall | auto |
General questions, chat | Balances speed, cost, and quality |
| Best code | auto/coding |
Writing code, debugging | Picks models good at coding tasks |
| Fastest response | auto/fast |
Quick answers, low latency | Prioritizes speed over everything |
| Cheapest option | auto/cheap |
Saving money | Picks the cheapest provider |
| Smartest model | auto/smart |
Complex tasks | Quality-first + explores new models |
| Most available | auto/offline |
When providers are busy | Picks providers with most capacity |
Examples
Section titled “Examples”# General chat — balancedcurl http://localhost:20128/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"model":"auto","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello!"}]}'
# Code generation — quality-firstcurl http://localhost:20128/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"model":"auto/coding","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Write a Python function"}]}'
# Quick answer — speed-firstcurl http://localhost:20128/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"model":"auto/fast","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"What is 2+2?"}]}'How It Works (Simple Version)
Section titled “How It Works (Simple Version)”When you send a request with model: "auto", OmniRoute:
- Looks at all your connected providers — Every provider you’ve added (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.)
- Scores each one, weighing among other things:
- Is it working? (health)
- Does it have capacity? (quota)
- How much does it cost? (price)
- How fast is it? (speed)
- Is it good at this task? (quality)
- Picks the best one — The highest-scoring provider gets your request
- Auto-recovers — If it fails, OmniRoute tries the next one automatically
The Scoring System
Section titled “The Scoring System”Each provider gets a score from 0 to 1. The higher the score, the better the fit.
| Factor | Weight | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Health | 20% | Is the provider working? (circuit breaker state) |
| Quota | 15% | Does it have capacity remaining? |
| Cost | 15% | How expensive is it? (cheaper = higher score) |
| Speed | 12% | How fast is it? (lower latency = higher score) |
| Task Fit | 8% | Is it good at this type of task? |
| Stability | 5% | Is it consistent? (low error rate) |
| Tier | 5% | Account tier (Ultra > Pro > Free) |
| Other | 20% | Context affinity, connection density, etc. |
How Variants Change the Scoring
Section titled “How Variants Change the Scoring”Each variant uses different weights:
| Variant | Prioritizes | Key Weights |
|---|---|---|
auto |
Balanced | health=20%, quota=15%, cost=15% |
auto/coding |
Quality | taskFit=37%, stability=15% |
auto/fast |
Speed | latency=32%, health=28% |
auto/cheap |
Cost | cost=37% |
auto/smart |
Quality + Explore | taskFit=37%, exploration=10% |
auto/offline |
Capacity | quota=37%, health=28% |
How It Handles Failures
Section titled “How It Handles Failures”OmniRoute has three layers of protection:
1. Auto-Fallback
Section titled “1. Auto-Fallback”If the best provider fails, OmniRoute automatically tries the next one. You don’t need to do anything.
2. Self-Healing
Section titled “2. Self-Healing”If a provider keeps failing:
- Score < 0.2 → Excluded for 5 minutes
- Circuit breaker open → Auto-excluded
- More than 50% providers down → Incident mode (no exploration)
3. Emergency Fallback
Section titled “3. Emergency Fallback”If all providers fail, OmniRoute routes to stable free providers (like Kiro or Qoder) as a last resort.
Multi-Account Support
Section titled “Multi-Account Support”If you have multiple accounts for the same provider (e.g., two OpenAI keys), OmniRoute treats each as a separate candidate. This means:
- Account A has quota remaining → use it
- Account B is rate-limited → skip it
- Account C is cheaper → prefer it
Each account is scored independently based on its own health, quota, and speed.
Bandit Exploration
Section titled “Bandit Exploration”OmniRoute occasionally explores new providers to discover better options:
- Default: 5% of requests go to random providers
- Auto/smart: 10% exploration rate
- Disabled when more than 50% of providers are unhealthy
This helps OmniRoute learn which providers work best for your usage patterns.
Common Questions
Section titled “Common Questions”“Will it always pick the most expensive model?”
Section titled ““Will it always pick the most expensive model?””No. Cost is only 15% of the score by default. A cheap, fast, healthy provider can beat an expensive one. Use auto/cheap if you want to prioritize cost even more.
“What if a provider goes down?”
Section titled ““What if a provider goes down?””OmniRoute automatically skips it and tries the next one. If a provider keeps failing, it’s excluded temporarily (5-30 minutes). You don’t need to do anything.
“Can I see which provider was used?”
Section titled ““Can I see which provider was used?””Check the response headers — OmniRoute includes the provider and model used in each response.
“Does it learn from my usage?”
Section titled ““Does it learn from my usage?””Yes! The scoring system uses historical data (latency, error rates, success rates) to make better decisions over time.
“What’s the difference between auto and auto/smart?”
Section titled ““What’s the difference between auto and auto/smart?””auto— Balanced, 5% explorationauto/smart— Quality-first (same weights asauto/coding), 10% exploration
Use auto/smart when you want the best quality and are okay with occasional exploration.
“Can I force a specific provider?”
Section titled ““Can I force a specific provider?””Yes! Use a combo with priority strategy instead of auto, then send the combo’s exact name as the model field (e.g. model: "my-combo" — not auto). See the Technical Reference for details.
“How is this different from round-robin?”
Section titled ““How is this different from round-robin?””Round-robin cycles through providers in order. Auto-combo scores each provider and picks the best one. It’s smarter — it considers health, speed, cost, and quality.
What’s Next?
Section titled “What’s Next?”- Connect a Provider — Add your first AI provider
- Free Tiers Guide — Get free AI with no credit card
- Troubleshooting — Fix common issues
- Technical Reference — Deep dive into the scoring algorithm
Learn More
Section titled “Learn More”For developers and contributors, see the Auto-Combo Technical Reference for:
- Full 16-factor scoring algorithm
- Mode pack weight tables
- Implementation file paths
- API endpoints
- Self-healing algorithm details
HagiCode
HagiCode is an agentic coding workspace: structured workflows, multi-agent execution, and Hero Dungeon views turn ideas into shipped software.
Turn ideas into polished, usable software with a smarter, faster, and more enjoyable agentic coding workflow.

- SmartStructured workflows turn intent into an executable path from idea to shipped change.
- EfficientMulti-agent workflows keep research, implementation, and review moving in parallel.
- FunHero Dungeon interfaces make long coding sessions visual, collaborative, and rewarding.